(A) 第 15-24 題 A newly installed sculpture in central London recently attracted public attention after it was confirmed as the work of the 15 street artist Banksy. The artwork depicts a man carrying a large flag that obscures his vision as he walks toward the edge of a pedestal. The piece quickly 16 discussion not only about its symbolic message but also about the identity of its creator. For decades, Banksy has remained anonymous, raising an important question: does anonymity simply hide an artist, or does it influence the way people understand the artwork? Supporters of anonymity argue that it encourages audiences to focus on the artwork rather than the artist. When viewers know little about an artist's background, they are more likely to engage 17 with the message. In this sense, anonymity serves as a safeguard against 18 and allows artistic meaning to emerge from the work itself. Furthermore, many people believe that Banksy's anonymity has become an important part of his appeal. Years of speculation have transformed it from a protective measure into a valuable 19 . Critics, however, question whether such secrecy should continue indefinitely. 20 Banksy's influence on public discourse and the enormous value of his work, some journalists argue that revealing his identity serves the public interest. They maintain that anonymity may make 21 difficult to determine responsibility and to understand the influences behind important works of art. From this perspective, greater transparency can promote accountability. The debate also raises a deeper question about 22 . Once audiences associate a specific identity with an artist, they may begin to understand the artwork according to what they know about that person's background and intentions. 23 , information that appears to clarify meaning may actually limit it. Whether Banksy's true identity will ever be confirmed remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that anonymity has become far more than 24 . It continues to influence artistic value, public perception, and cultural discourse.