Examly題庫立即開始練習
國小教甄|英語英語114 年第 42 題單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
(ii) Geotagging of destinations is widely lamented for fueling overtourism, but now is being used to help travelers with disabilities, aid in wildlife conservation, and showcase forgotten Black history. When tourists upload images or videos to Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, or X (formerly Twitter), they commonly use geotagging, which attaches their GPS coordinates. This allows them to document their travels, but can also trigger a deluge of visitors to heavily geotagged spots, like Arizona’s Horseshoe Bend, which became more littered. On the flip side, geotagging is increasingly being used in positive ways, helping to address environmental and social issues, and even crowding, according to tourism experts. Aiding tourists with disabilities is one of several upsides to geotagging, says Ulrich Gunter, professor of tourism economics at Modul University Vienna in Austria. Google Maps has a function that shows wheelchair-accessible routes through many of the world’s major cities, based on geotagging of accessible ramps, lifts, and car parks. At the same time, tourists can harm a destination by geotagging it, warns Greg Richards, professor of placemaking and events at Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Amsterdam is experiencing a blight dubbed the “TikTok queue,” where tourists swarm the same few geotagged restaurants or cafes trending on social media so they can film similar videos to post online. TikTok queues cause commotion, crowding, and littering, Richards explains. Some venues are so inundated, like Amsterdam’s Fabel Fries restaurant, that they now have two lines, one for regular customers, and another for content creators. Geotagging can also harm natural locations, like South Africa’s Kruger National Park, where poachers tracked endangered animals via social media posts. Such spots which are widely geotagged often suffer “soil erosion, habitat destruction, and depletion of local flora and fauna due to uncontrolled visitor activities,” says Natalia Bayona, executive director at the United Nations World Tourism Organization. Fortunately, geotagging by travelers can have benefits for wilderness destinations, Bayona adds. This technology is being used by tourists to aid citizen science projects, such as wildlife tracking and environmental monitoring. “By sharing the location of various flora and fauna, or reporting instances of littering and pollution, tourists can help local authorities and conservationists better understand ecological trends and challenges,” she says. “This grassroots approach not only empowers travelers by giving them a sense of agency in preserving the destinations they love, but also fosters a deeper connection between tourists and the local environment.”

According to the article, which of the following is not a downside to geotagging?

AIt increases air pollution正確答案
BIt helps poacher find and hunt endangered animals
CIt can lead to more crowding and littering
DIt can lead to soil erosion
答案與詳解
A
正確答案
文章明確提到的地理標記負面影響包括擁擠、垃圾、盜獵與土壤侵蝕,但未提到增加空氣污染,因此選 A。

為什麼答案是 A

文章未提到地理標記會增加空氣污染。雖然觀光可能衍生環境問題,但本文列出的負面影響不包含空氣污染,因此符合「not a downside」。

載入中…

英語 相關題目

想練更多英語考古題?

Examly 收錄 38 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

黑皮