Examly題庫
國小教甄|英語英語文(含臺南文史)111 年第 87 題單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
Music can soothe the soul and speed along creativity, but it won’t, according to researchers from Harvard, boost intelligence. “More than 80 percent of American adults think that music improves children’s grades or intelligence,” said Samuel Mehr, a Harvard Graduate School of Education doctoral student working in the lab of psychology professor Elizabeth Spelke, in a statement. “Even in the scientific community, there’s a general belief that music is important for these extrinsic reasons – but there is very little evidence supporting the idea that music classes enhance children’s cognitive development.” The myth that music improves intelligence can be tied to a study published in 1993 in the journal Nature, which describes the “Mozart effect” as the ability for individuals who play instruments to perform better at spatial tasks. The study was later debunked, but the idea that music could make you smarter remained. When the Harvard investigators reviewed the available research connecting music and intelligence, they found that only five studies used randomized trials, the gold standard of scientific research in which participants were randomly assigned to either learn music or not, and only one reported a clear correlation to intelligence. And that study showed just a 2.7 increase in IQ among people who took music lessons for a year, which was barely considered statistically significant. Therefore, to test the connection themselves, Mehr’s team studied 29 parents and their four-year-old children. The children took vocabulary tests and the parents took music aptitude tests at the start of the study. Then, the groups were randomly assigned to either take music training or visual art training together. The same teacher taught both of the classes, and the participants were again assessed after a year on cognition, vocabulary, math, and spatial tasks. These measures, the researchers say, are more accurate than a simple IQ test of cognitive abilities. Music training, it turned out, did not benefit the groups’ cognition. The participants performed similarly on the vocabulary and number estimation measures and the children who had music training performed only slightly better on one spatial task. The researchers then replicated the study again, but with 45 parents and children. Half the group was given music training and the other half didn’t receive any. As with the first study, the second round produced no evidence that musical training made the participants any smarter. The researchers limited their research to classic music, and haven’t assessed whether the type of music makes any difference. And while they concluded that the idea that music makes you smarter is a myth, they argue that teaching children music is still important, and may have other benefits that aren’t all connected to cognitive skills.

According to the passage, why did the Harvard investigators conduct their own experiments?

AHarvard University attempted to provide further support to the importance of music.
BTheir studies investigating the effects of music on human behavior received criticisms and challenges.
CThe psychologist Elizabeth Spelke’s laboratory received a big sum of funding from the music industry.
DTheir literature reviews revealed there was scarce evidence to support music can enhance intelligence.正確答案
答案與詳解
D
正確答案
答案為D:哈佛研究者回顧文獻後,發現音樂能提升智力的證據不足,因此自行進行實驗驗證。

逐選項解析

AHarvard University attempted to provide further support to the importance of music.✕ 易錯陷阱
文章結尾確實肯定音樂教育仍有重要性,但這是研究後的補充觀點,不是自行進行實驗的原因;研究目的在驗證音樂與智力的關聯。
BTheir studies investigating the effects of music on human behavior received criticisms and challenges.✕ 易錯陷阱
短文提到先前描述「莫札特效應」的研究後來遭到駁斥,並未說哈佛研究者自己的研究受到批評與挑戰,不可偷換研究主體。
CThe psychologist Elizabeth Spelke’s laboratory received a big sum of funding from the music industry.✕ 錯誤
DTheir literature reviews revealed there was scarce evidence to support music can enhance intelligence.✓ 正確

立即註冊,看完整詳解

這題的完整詳解,註冊就能看 · 每天 2 題免費

精選詳解
  • 完整逐選項解析
  • 秒殺解題技巧與破題關鍵
  • 關鍵知識表整理
  • 陷阱與易錯提醒
  • 同考點歷屆題庫連續刷題與錯題本
接著練習整份考卷查看 111 年 國小教甄|英語《英語文(含臺南文史)》完整試題與解答

英語文(含臺南文史) 相關題目

想練更多英語文(含臺南文史)考古題?

Examly 收錄 50 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Examly