Examly題庫立即開始練習
國際經濟商務人員考試三等考試-國際經濟商務人員類科日文組外國文(日文兼試基礎英文)107 年第 20 題單選題考點:閱讀細節考點:主詞與主張對象混淆
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
What's so bad about being a target online tracked by advertisers? If you don't mind being watched by tracking company employees while you're purchasing or logging into your account on websites, you are not involved in the fuss. In the past few years, a dispute has illustrated. Advertisers collected such fine-grained information about you such as the websites you frequent, what kind of products you're interested and even some private stuff like political views, health problems, and personal finances. Should advertisers have explicit permission to track people and send behavioral ads? In 2010, America's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recommended a proposal that consumers should be given a simple "Do Not Track" (DNT) option by Internet browsers. Consumers could tell advertisers whether they want to be followed or not. FTC and Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA) agreed that the industry would make a start on responding to DNT requests. Microsoft's Internet Explorer, Apple's Safari, Google Chrome, and Mozilla's Firefox offered to implement DNT in top gear. Ironically, nowadays some privacy-conscious users may be offended by the new release of Google Chrome for iOS disables DNT in order to have better speed and fewer crashes. Microsoft used to say that Internet Explorer 10 would have DNT as a default; the company is reversing its standard now: DNT will not turn up as a default feature in its new browsers. Getting a DNT signal does not oblige advertisers to stop tracking, although some self-restrained companies have promised to do so. It is much harder to distinguish whether someone is really against behavior ads or whether they stick with "interest-based" ads. Some users may ignore DNT and press on anyway. Advertisers honor DNT but argue that the decision should be up to users but not by browser vendors. Based on the voluntary principle of "Do Not Track," Microsoft, Chrome and Firefox leave "Do Not Track" off by default. Whether consumers turn DNT on or off is not probably important all that much. After all, using tools like Disconnect Ad Blocking and add-ons like Ghostery and uBlock are more effective if online users want to make sure that they aren't tracked.

According to the advertisers, who would have the right to decide if the DNT is turned on or off?

AInternet company employers
Bonline advertisers
Conline consumers正確答案
DInternet browse developers
答案與詳解
C
正確答案
廣告商認為DNT開關應由使用者(消費者)自行決定,而非瀏覽器供應商。

逐選項解析

AInternet company employers閱讀細節✕ 錯誤
短文從未提及「網路公司員工(Internet company employers)」有權決定DNT開關,此選項無文本依據。
Bonline advertisers主詞與主張對象混淆✕ 易錯陷阱
廣告商(advertisers)是發表這項主張的人,但他們主張的是『使用者』應有決定權,並非廣告商自己,容易與題目混淆。短文原文:'advertisers honor DNT but argue that the decision should be up to users'。
Conline consumers✓ 正確
DInternet browse developers✕ 易錯陷阱

立即註冊,看完整詳解

這題的完整詳解,註冊就能看 · 每天 2 題免費

精選詳解
  • 完整逐選項解析
  • 秒殺解題技巧與破題關鍵
  • 關鍵知識表整理
  • 陷阱與易錯提醒
  • 同考點歷屆題庫連續刷題與錯題本

外國文(日文兼試基礎英文) 相關題目

想練更多外國文(日文兼試基礎英文)考古題?

Examly 收錄 50 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Examly