Examly題庫立即開始練習
國際經濟商務人員考試三等考試-國際經濟商務人員類科日文組外國文(日文兼試基礎英文)10719單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
What's so bad about being a target online tracked by advertisers? If you don't mind being watched by tracking company employees while you're purchasing or logging into your account on websites, you are not involved in the fuss. In the past few years, a dispute has illustrated. Advertisers collected such fine-grained information about you such as the websites you frequent, what kind of products you're interested and even some private stuff like political views, health problems, and personal finances. Should advertisers have explicit permission to track people and send behavioral ads? In 2010, America's Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recommended a proposal that consumers should be given a simple "Do Not Track" (DNT) option by Internet browsers. Consumers could tell advertisers whether they want to be followed or not. FTC and Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA) agreed that the industry would make a start on responding to DNT requests. Microsoft's Internet Explorer, Apple's Safari, Google Chrome, and Mozilla's Firefox offered to implement DNT in top gear. Ironically, nowadays some privacy-conscious users may be offended by the new release of Google Chrome for iOS disables DNT in order to have better speed and fewer crashes. Microsoft used to say that Internet Explorer 10 would have DNT as a default; the company is reversing its standard now: DNT will not turn up as a default feature in its new browsers. Getting a DNT signal does not oblige advertisers to stop tracking, although some self-restrained companies have promised to do so. It is much harder to distinguish whether someone is really against behavior ads or whether they stick with "interest-based" ads. Some users may ignore DNT and press on anyway. Advertisers honor DNT but argue that the decision should be up to users but not by browser vendors. Based on the voluntary principle of "Do Not Track," Microsoft, Chrome and Firefox leave "Do Not Track" off by default. Whether consumers turn DNT on or off is not probably important all that much. After all, using tools like Disconnect Ad Blocking and add-ons like Ghostery and uBlock are more effective if online users want to make sure that they aren't tracked.

What may be the reason for browsers to leave DNT off by default?

Ato make sure that the online users are not tracked
Bto show that it does reflect the users' preference正確答案
Cto support the advertisers for not honoring it
Dto respond to the privacy-conscious users
答案與詳解
B
正確答案
瀏覽器預設關閉DNT是基於自願原則,反映使用者應自行選擇是否追蹤,而非瀏覽器替使用者決定。

為什麼答案是 B

短文第三段:「Advertisers honor DNT but argue that the decision should be up to users but not by browser vendors. Based on the voluntary principle of 'Do Not Track,' Microsoft, Chrome and Firefox leave 'Do Not Track' off by default.」瀏覽器預設關閉DNT,是為了體現「決定權應在使用者而非瀏覽器供應商」的自願原則,即反映使用者應自行表達偏好。

考點:DNT預設狀態效果考點:DNT自願原則考點:廣告商與DNT關係考點:隱私意識使用者態度
載入中…

想練更多外國文(日文兼試基礎英文)考古題?

Examly 收錄 38 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Download on theApp Store即將推出Google Play
黑皮