📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
For generations, we have consistently underestimated our capacity for innovation. There was a time when we worried that all of London would be covered with horse manure because of the increasing use of horse-drawn carriages. Thanks to the invention of the car, dung disaster averted. In fact, would-be catastrophes have regularly been pushed aside throughout human history, and so often because of innovation and technological development. Think of the debate over cutting emissions today. Instead of single-mindedly trying to force people to do without carbon-emitting fuels, we must recognize that we won’t make any real progress in cutting CO2 emissions until we can create affordable, efficient alternatives. We are far from that point today: much-hyped technologies such as wind and solar energy remain very expensive and inefficient compared with cheap fossil fuels. Current technology is so inefficient that, to take just one example, if we were serious about wind power, we would have to blanket most countries with wind turbines to generate enough energy for everybody, and we would still have the massive problem of storage. We don’t know what to do when the wind doesn’t blow. Making the necessary breakthrough will require mass improvements across many technologies. (from Newsweek, June 20, 2011)
Which of the following statements would the author most likely agree with?
ACurrent technology cannot provide efficient energy alternatives.正確答案
BIt is impossible to cut $CO_{2}$ emissions.
CLondon used to be covered with horse manure.
DSolar energy is more expensive then wind energy.
答案與詳解
