Examly題庫立即開始練習
調查三等考試-調查工作組(選試英文)外國文(英文)112 年第 40 題單選題考點:角色職責混淆考點:無中生有
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
請依下文回答第 36 題至第 40 題 An inquiry within legal bounds is an exact and structured activity designed to unveil truth in criminal matters. It demands swift intervention from law enforcement at the crime scene, rigorous collection of evidence, and extensive dialogues with eyewitnesses. The professionals engaged in investigating the crime scene meticulously focus on every detail, compile and assess pieces of evidence, and engage in dialogues to construct the event timeline and spotlight potential avenues for additional exploration. Employing various strategies, their aim is to excavate critical specifics and solve the riddle associated with the case. Forensic experts have an integral role in this procedure as they employ scientific methods to scrutinize tangible proof. These specialists are adept in examining DNA data, fingerprints, and ballistics to draw correlations between potential offenders and the crime location. Their concentrated expertise and impartial scientific perspectives contribute significantly to court proceedings. Lawyers, including both prosecutors and defense attorneys, are essential contributors to the investigative process. Prosecutors partner with investigators to assess proof and create a solid case against the accused, with the intent to establish guilt beyond any doubt. In contrast, defense attorneys meticulously review the prosecution's evidence, challenge its legitimacy, and aim to introduce reasonable doubt. In the course of the inquiry, police units collaborate with forensic labs to ensure a complete assessment of all evidence. This joint effort bolsters the reliability of the investigation and introduces specialized skills such as DNA profiling and digital forensics. After the completion of the investigation, the findings are presented in court. At this stage, judges and members of the jury meticulously evaluate the proof and make their decisions based on the provided information. The judicial process enables all involved parties to present their arguments, cross-examine witnesses, and make assertions based on the collected evidence. The ultimate aim, achieved through cooperative professional efforts and rigorous examination of evidence, is to ensure justice and reveal the actual events of the case.

How do judges and jurors reach verdicts in court?

ABy establishing the investigation protocol and identifying potential leads.
BBy analyzing the suspect's demographic background.
CBy collaborating with private detectives to evaluate the evidence.
DBy reviewing the evidence and making judgments based on the presented information.正確答案
答案與詳解
D
正確答案
根據文章,法官與陪審團在法庭上是透過詳細評估證據(evaluate the proof),並依據所提供的資訊來做出裁決(make their decisions)。

逐選項解析

ABy establishing the investigation protocol and identifying potential leads.角色職責混淆✕ 易錯陷阱
文章指出建立調查程序與尋找潛在線索(spotlight potential avenues)是犯罪現場調查人員(professionals engaged in investigating)的職責,而非審判階段法官與陪審團的工作。
BBy analyzing the suspect's demographic background.無中生有✕ 錯誤
文章中完全沒有提及分析嫌疑人的「人口統計背景(demographic background)」,屬於無中生有的干擾選項。
CBy collaborating with private detectives to evaluate the evidence.✕ 錯誤
DBy reviewing the evidence and making judgments based on the presented information.✓ 正確

立即註冊,看完整詳解

這題的完整詳解,註冊就能看 · 每天 2 題免費

精選詳解
  • 完整逐選項解析
  • 秒殺解題技巧與破題關鍵
  • 關鍵知識表整理
  • 陷阱與易錯提醒
  • 同考點歷屆題庫連續刷題與錯題本

外國文(英文) 相關題目

想練更多外國文(英文)考古題?

Examly 收錄 50 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Examly