Examly題庫立即開始練習
國中教甄|英語英語115 年第 70 題單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
When Dr. Helena Morris announced her laboratory’s breakthrough in memory-enhancement technology, international media outlets immediately celebrated the discovery as a revolutionary advancement in neuroscience. The device, developed after nearly fifteen years of research, appeared capable of strengthening memory retention in patients experiencing cognitive decline. Universities invited Morris to deliver lectures, investors offered substantial financial support, and pharmaceutical companies began negotiating licensing agreements. However, public enthusiasm soon became more complicated. During a televised interview, Morris acknowledged that the technology might eventually be adapted for non-medical purposes. Some commentators immediately speculated about military applications, corporate surveillance, and educational inequality. If wealthy individuals gained access to expensive cognitive-enhancement devices, critics argued, academic competition could become fundamentally unfair. Others defended the research, insisting that scientific progress should not be rejected merely because technology could potentially be misused. Historians pointed out that many important scientific developments—including the internet and genetic medicine—had initially generated similar fears. According to supporters, ethical concerns should encourage responsible regulation rather than prevent innovation altogether. Meanwhile, journalists began examining the financial relationships between Morris’s laboratory and private technology companies. Although no evidence of misconduct emerged, some critics questioned whether scientific research funded by corporations could remain entirely objective. Morris herself repeatedly emphasized that scientific transparency and public oversight were essential to maintaining trust. By the following year, the debate had expanded far beyond neuroscience. Universities, policymakers, ethicists, and journalists were now discussing broader questions concerning fairness, privacy, and the social responsibilities of scientific research in technologically advanced societies.

What argument do supporters of the research make?

ACorporate funding should be banned immediately.
BAll technology is inherently dangerous.
CScientific progress should be regulated rather than stopped正確答案
D(D)Scientific discoveries should remain secret. The word "objective" is closest in meaning to
答案與詳解
C
正確答案
支持者主張倫理擔憂應促使負責任的監管,而非完全阻止科學創新。

為什麼答案是 C

對應文章第三段 ethical concerns should encourage responsible regulation rather than prevent innovation altogether,意即科學進步應受監管而非被阻止。

載入中…

英語 相關題目

想練更多英語考古題?

Examly 收錄 38 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

黑皮