📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
When Dr. Helena Morris announced her laboratory’s breakthrough in memory-enhancement technology, international media outlets immediately celebrated the discovery as a revolutionary advancement in neuroscience. The device, developed after nearly fifteen years of research, appeared capable of strengthening memory retention in patients experiencing cognitive decline. Universities invited Morris to deliver lectures, investors offered substantial financial support, and pharmaceutical companies began negotiating licensing agreements.
However, public enthusiasm soon became more complicated. During a televised interview, Morris acknowledged that the technology might eventually be adapted for non-medical purposes. Some commentators immediately speculated about military applications, corporate surveillance, and educational inequality. If wealthy individuals gained access to expensive cognitive-enhancement devices, critics argued, academic competition could become fundamentally unfair.
Others defended the research, insisting that scientific progress should not be rejected merely because technology could potentially be misused. Historians pointed out that many important scientific developments—including the internet and genetic medicine—had initially generated similar fears. According to supporters, ethical concerns should encourage responsible regulation rather than prevent innovation altogether.
Meanwhile, journalists began examining the financial relationships between Morris’s laboratory and private technology companies. Although no evidence of misconduct emerged, some critics questioned whether scientific research funded by corporations could remain entirely objective. Morris herself repeatedly emphasized that scientific transparency and public oversight were essential to maintaining trust.
By the following year, the debate had expanded far beyond neuroscience. Universities, policymakers, ethicists, and journalists were now discussing broader questions concerning fairness, privacy, and the social responsibilities of scientific research in technologically advanced societies.
Which statement best reflects the author's perspective?
AScientific research should be controlled entirely by corporations.
BTechnological innovation requires progress and ethical oversight.正確答案
CEthical concerns are unimportant.
DJournalists misunderstand science completely.
答案與詳解
