Examly題庫
國中教甄|英語英語115 年第 68 題單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
When Dr. Helena Morris announced her laboratory’s breakthrough in memory-enhancement technology, international media outlets immediately celebrated the discovery as a revolutionary advancement in neuroscience. The device, developed after nearly fifteen years of research, appeared capable of strengthening memory retention in patients experiencing cognitive decline. Universities invited Morris to deliver lectures, investors offered substantial financial support, and pharmaceutical companies began negotiating licensing agreements. However, public enthusiasm soon became more complicated. During a televised interview, Morris acknowledged that the technology might eventually be adapted for non-medical purposes. Some commentators immediately speculated about military applications, corporate surveillance, and educational inequality. If wealthy individuals gained access to expensive cognitive-enhancement devices, critics argued, academic competition could become fundamentally unfair. Others defended the research, insisting that scientific progress should not be rejected merely because technology could potentially be misused. Historians pointed out that many important scientific developments—including the internet and genetic medicine—had initially generated similar fears. According to supporters, ethical concerns should encourage responsible regulation rather than prevent innovation altogether. Meanwhile, journalists began examining the financial relationships between Morris’s laboratory and private technology companies. Although no evidence of misconduct emerged, some critics questioned whether scientific research funded by corporations could remain entirely objective. Morris herself repeatedly emphasized that scientific transparency and public oversight were essential to maintaining trust. By the following year, the debate had expanded far beyond neuroscience. Universities, policymakers, ethicists, and journalists were now discussing broader questions concerning fairness, privacy, and the social responsibilities of scientific research in technologically advanced societies.

What is the main issue explored in the passage?

Athe history of neuroscience
Bthe ethical debate of memory-enhancement technology正確答案
Cthe decline of public universities
Dmethods of medical advertising
答案與詳解
B
正確答案
文章主要探討記憶增強技術問世後,所引發關於潛在濫用、社會公平及企業資助等倫理爭議。

逐選項解析

Athe history of neuroscience✕ 錯誤
文章僅在第三段簡略提及網際網路與基因醫學等歷史發展作為佐證,並非探討神經科學的歷史。
Bthe ethical debate of memory-enhancement technology✓ 正確
文章從技術突破談起,隨後探討非醫療用途的潛在風險、社會公平性、科學進步與監管的平衡,以及企業資助的客觀性,皆屬於記憶增強技術的倫理辯論。
Cthe decline of public universities✕ 錯誤
Dmethods of medical advertising✕ 錯誤

立即註冊,看完整詳解

這題的完整詳解,註冊就能看 · 每天 2 題免費

精選詳解
  • 完整逐選項解析
  • 秒殺解題技巧與破題關鍵
  • 關鍵知識表整理
  • 陷阱與易錯提醒
  • 同考點歷屆題庫連續刷題與錯題本
接著練習整份考卷查看 115 年 國中教甄|英語《英語》完整試題與解答

英語 相關題目

想練更多英語考古題?

Examly 收錄 50 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Examly