Examly題庫立即開始練習
警察人員考試四等考試-行政警察人員類別中華民國憲法與警察專業英文10550單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
On April 17, 2011, Helen Lander was found dead in her home. The medical examiner Dr. Robertson originally declared the death an accident. After an anonymous letter and belief from former medical examiner Meryn Jumble that Helen's death was a murder, the case was reopened. Helen's husband, Mr. Richard Lander, was indicted on charges of murder and tampering with evidence. However, Lander had a solid alibi. His daughter, the sole eyewitness, claimed that the door to the bathroom was shut, and when Lander heard no response from his wife, he opened the door and found his wife, and then he moved her to the bedroom to lay her on a more comfortable floor. Besides, the prosecution failed to come up with a murder weapon and motive at beginning. Later in the trial, an alleged murder weapon was brought forth, the shower bench. But Lander's defense team called upon many witnesses to testify for Mr. Lander. One of them was Tracy Williams, a personal trainer, who said Helen Lander had dizziness, which would explain why she fell in the shower. The possibility that Lander was innocent was quickly disputed by the facts that District Attorney Will Thompson displayed. From the opening statements of the trial, the prosecution stressed the idea that, in view of the rigor mortis, i.e., the stiffening of the limbs after death, Helen Lander had been dead for hours before her daughter called the police. The rigor mortis, which would not happen in twenty minutes, contradicted Lander's alibi that he moved his wife's body from the bathroom where he claimed that she fell to the bedroom almost 60 feet away. Lander's movement of the body also became more noted when the prosecution began to investigate blood spatter around the bedroom. There was blood spatter at the scene on a bedside lampshade, a slanted wall and water bottles next to the bed. This blood spatter indicated to Rose Green, a forensic scientist, that the injuries occurred while at the bedside, not the shower as Mr. Lander had claimed. After a two-week-long trial, Mr. Lander was found guilty of second-degree murder in killing his wife. He was also convicted of tampering with evidence in his attempt to cover up the crime.

According to the passage, which of the following statements is true?

AThe murder weapon was not found.
BThere were several eyewitnesses to the murder.
CHelen Lander fell in the shower because of dizziness.
DThe motive of the murder is not mentioned in the passage.正確答案
答案與詳解
D
正確答案
本題考查閱讀理解,需比對文章細節判斷哪個陳述為真,正解D:文章未提及謀殺動機。

為什麼答案是 D

原文第二段提到「the prosecution failed to come up with a murder weapon and motive at beginning」,說明起初未能提出動機;全文通篇均未具體說明謀殺動機為何,故「動機在文中未被提及」為真確陳述,符合題目要求。

考點:細節比對/時間順序考點:細節比對/sole eyewitness考點:推論辨別/辯護說法≠事實考點:全文主旨/細節缺漏辨識
載入中…

中華民國憲法與警察專業英文 相關題目

想練更多中華民國憲法與警察專業英文考古題?

Examly 收錄 38 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Download on theApp Store即將推出Google Play
黑皮