Examly題庫立即開始練習
警察人員考試四等考試-行政警察人員類別中華民國憲法與警察專業英文10548單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
On April 17, 2011, Helen Lander was found dead in her home. The medical examiner Dr. Robertson originally declared the death an accident. After an anonymous letter and belief from former medical examiner Meryn Jumble that Helen's death was a murder, the case was reopened. Helen's husband, Mr. Richard Lander, was indicted on charges of murder and tampering with evidence. However, Lander had a solid alibi. His daughter, the sole eyewitness, claimed that the door to the bathroom was shut, and when Lander heard no response from his wife, he opened the door and found his wife, and then he moved her to the bedroom to lay her on a more comfortable floor. Besides, the prosecution failed to come up with a murder weapon and motive at beginning. Later in the trial, an alleged murder weapon was brought forth, the shower bench. But Lander's defense team called upon many witnesses to testify for Mr. Lander. One of them was Tracy Williams, a personal trainer, who said Helen Lander had dizziness, which would explain why she fell in the shower. The possibility that Lander was innocent was quickly disputed by the facts that District Attorney Will Thompson displayed. From the opening statements of the trial, the prosecution stressed the idea that, in view of the rigor mortis, i.e., the stiffening of the limbs after death, Helen Lander had been dead for hours before her daughter called the police. The rigor mortis, which would not happen in twenty minutes, contradicted Lander's alibi that he moved his wife's body from the bathroom where he claimed that she fell to the bedroom almost 60 feet away. Lander's movement of the body also became more noted when the prosecution began to investigate blood spatter around the bedroom. There was blood spatter at the scene on a bedside lampshade, a slanted wall and water bottles next to the bed. This blood spatter indicated to Rose Green, a forensic scientist, that the injuries occurred while at the bedside, not the shower as Mr. Lander had claimed. After a two-week-long trial, Mr. Lander was found guilty of second-degree murder in killing his wife. He was also convicted of tampering with evidence in his attempt to cover up the crime.

Why didn't Mr. Lander have a solid alibi?

AThe text message left by Helen was contradictory with his testimony.
BThe time his daughter was with him was not Helen's death time.正確答案
CAn anonymous letter pointed out the invalidity of his alibi.
DA mysterious woman witnessed the murder.
答案與詳解
B
正確答案
Lander的不在場證明被反駁,因為屍僵現象顯示Helen死亡時間遠早於其女兒報警的時間點,時間根本對不上。

為什麼答案是 B

短文指出「屍僵現象不可能在20分鐘內發生」,而Helen已死亡數小時才被報警,意即女兒在場作證的時間並非Helen真正的死亡時間,使Lander的alibi無效。短文原文:'the prosecution stressed the idea that, in view of the rigor mortis...Helen Lander had been dead for hours before her daughter called the police.'

考點:細節理解考點:主旨推論/細節理解考點:細節辨析
載入中…

中華民國憲法與警察專業英文 相關題目

想練更多中華民國憲法與警察專業英文考古題?

Examly 收錄 38 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Download on theApp Store即將推出Google Play
黑皮