Examly題庫立即開始練習
警察人員考試四等考試-行政警察人員類別中華民國憲法與警察專業英文10547單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
On April 17, 2011, Helen Lander was found dead in her home. The medical examiner Dr. Robertson originally declared the death an accident. After an anonymous letter and belief from former medical examiner Meryn Jumble that Helen's death was a murder, the case was reopened. Helen's husband, Mr. Richard Lander, was indicted on charges of murder and tampering with evidence. However, Lander had a solid alibi. His daughter, the sole eyewitness, claimed that the door to the bathroom was shut, and when Lander heard no response from his wife, he opened the door and found his wife, and then he moved her to the bedroom to lay her on a more comfortable floor. Besides, the prosecution failed to come up with a murder weapon and motive at beginning. Later in the trial, an alleged murder weapon was brought forth, the shower bench. But Lander's defense team called upon many witnesses to testify for Mr. Lander. One of them was Tracy Williams, a personal trainer, who said Helen Lander had dizziness, which would explain why she fell in the shower. The possibility that Lander was innocent was quickly disputed by the facts that District Attorney Will Thompson displayed. From the opening statements of the trial, the prosecution stressed the idea that, in view of the rigor mortis, i.e., the stiffening of the limbs after death, Helen Lander had been dead for hours before her daughter called the police. The rigor mortis, which would not happen in twenty minutes, contradicted Lander's alibi that he moved his wife's body from the bathroom where he claimed that she fell to the bedroom almost 60 feet away. Lander's movement of the body also became more noted when the prosecution began to investigate blood spatter around the bedroom. There was blood spatter at the scene on a bedside lampshade, a slanted wall and water bottles next to the bed. This blood spatter indicated to Rose Green, a forensic scientist, that the injuries occurred while at the bedside, not the shower as Mr. Lander had claimed. After a two-week-long trial, Mr. Lander was found guilty of second-degree murder in killing his wife. He was also convicted of tampering with evidence in his attempt to cover up the crime.

Which is the most important evidence for Mr. Lander's prosecution?

ABlood stains were found in the bathroom.
BHelen's personal trainer testified against him.
CHelen's death time wasn't what Lander claimed to be.正確答案
DThe shower bench was found to be the murder weapon.
答案與詳解
C
正確答案
起訴方最關鍵證據是「屍僵」顯示Helen死亡時間遠早於Lander所稱,直接推翻其不在場證明。

為什麼答案是 C

短文明確說明:「the prosecution stressed the idea that, in view of the rigor mortis…Helen Lander had been dead for hours before her daughter called the police. The rigor mortis…contradicted Lander's alibi。」屍僵現象證明Helen死亡時間比Lander所稱早得多,直接推翻其不在場證明,是最重要的起訴證據。

考點:細節辨別/血跡位置考點:細節辨別/證人立場考點:主旨理解/關鍵證據考點:細節辨別/凶器認定
載入中…

中華民國憲法與警察專業英文 相關題目

想練更多中華民國憲法與警察專業英文考古題?

Examly 收錄 38 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Download on theApp Store即將推出Google Play
黑皮