Examly題庫立即開始練習
國際經濟商務人員考試三等考試-國際經濟商務人員類科國際經貿法律組英文(含國際貿易政策與法規命令之摘譯與論述)10728單選題
📖 閱讀測驗 · 共用前文
The recent proliferation of drones has spawned intellectual debates on whether a country has the right under the Law of Armed Conflicts and international law to unilaterally deploy these remotely controlled aircrafts abroad for military purposes. The use of drones in support of combat operations – particularly striking distant terror operatives – has become the most controversial legal topic. Many of the most frequently expressed criticisms about drones and drone warfare do not hold up well under serious scrutiny or, at any rate, there's nothing uniquely different or worse about drones when compared to other military technologies. Consider the most common anti-drone argument: drones kill a disproportionate number of civilian noncombatants. However, drones kill fewer civilians, as a percentage of total fatalities, than any other military weapon. According to the UN's mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) 2012 report, the number of Afghan civilian casualties caused by the United States and its allies did not increase in 2012; in fact, they decreased by 46 percent. More specifically, civilian casualties from "aerial attacks" fell 42 percent. The UNAMA report found that drones released 506 weapons in 2012, compared to 294 from the previous year. Five incidents resulted in casualties with sixteen civilians killed and three wounded, up from just one incident in 2011. Even as drone attacks increased, the UN reported an overall decrease in civilian deaths by airstrikes with the US-led coalition implementing stricter measures to prevent innocent people from being killed. In another empirical report concerning drone strikes cited by The New York Times, 522 strikes have killed an estimated 3,376 militants and 476 civilians, decimating al-Qaida leadership even as the loss of innocent life intensifies anti-American sentiment in nations where strikes occur. Further, according to The Long War Journal, an estimated 801 militant deaths in Pakistan occurred from US drone strikes in 2010. This figure is significantly higher than the 195 drone-caused deaths occurring from 2004 to 2007.

What is the author's attitude towards the use of drones as weapon?

Apositive正確答案
Bnegative
Cneutral
Ddoubtful
答案與詳解
A
正確答案
作者態度偏正面:文章系統性反駁反無人機論點,並用數據支持無人機造成平民傷亡比例低於其他武器。

為什麼答案是 A

作者明確指出反無人機論點「do not hold up well under serious scrutiny」,並引用UNAMA報告、《紐約時報》及Long War Journal數據,反覆強調無人機造成平民死亡比例低於其他武器,並肯定美軍實施更嚴格措施減少無辜傷亡,整體立場支持無人機使用,態度正面。

考點:作者態度/主旨推論考點:作者態度/陷阱辨識考點:作者態度/立場判斷考點:作者態度/語氣分析
載入中…

想練更多英文(含國際貿易政策與法規命令之摘譯與論述)考古題?

Examly 收錄 38 萬+ 道歷屆題目,每題都有像這樣的精選詳解。免費下載,立即開練。

Download on theApp Store即將推出Google Play
黑皮