In Palko v. Connecticut, the petitioner argued that the Fourteenth Amendment ___, as against the States, the Fifth Amendment requirement that no person “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” The Court disagreed, holding that federal double jeopardy standards were not applicable against the States.
Ainserted
Bincorporated正確答案
Cdeclared
Denumerated
答案與詳解
