The warning of the must be accompanied by the explanation that anything said can and will be used against the individual in court. This warning is needed in order to make him aware not only of the privilege, but also of the consequences of forgoing it.
Aright to have counsel present
Bright to object
Cright to trial by jury
Dright to remain silent正確答案
答案與詳解
D
正確答案
Miranda warning 核心:警告嫌犯有『保持緘默』權,且所言將呈堂證供。
為什麼答案是 D
Miranda v. Arizona 判決要求警方告知嫌犯『有權保持緘默,所言將成呈堂證供』,使其知悉不自證己罪特權及放棄此權的後果,故本格填 right to remain silent。
載入中…
完整詳解
Pro · 無限
重點Miranda warning 核心:警告嫌犯有『保持緘默』權,且所言將呈堂證供。
秒殺技巧
看到『anything said...used against...in court』立刻聯想 Miranda 警告第一句『right to remain silent』。
逐選項分析
A✕ 陷阱
律師在場權也是 Miranda warning 一環,但與『所言將作為呈堂證供』的後果連動的是緘默權,不是律師權。律師權對應的是『有權請律師』的警告。
B✕
right to object(異議權)是審判中律師對證據或詢問提出異議的程序權,與警訊階段的 Miranda warning 無關。
C✕
陪審團審判權是審判階段的憲法權利,不在警訊時告知的範圍,與『所言將作為呈堂證供』無直接關聯。
D✓ 正確
Miranda v. Arizona 判決要求警方告知嫌犯『有權保持緘默,所言將成呈堂證供』,使其知悉不自證己罪特權及放棄此權的後果,故本格填 right to remain silent。
Miranda Warnings 四大告知事項
項目
英文
中文
對應概念
1
right to remain silent
保持緘默權
不自證己罪 (5th Amendment)
2
anything said can be used against you
所言將呈堂證供
放棄緘默權之後果
3
right to an attorney
律師在場權
辯護權 (6th Amendment)
4
if cannot afford, one will be appointed
無資力可指定律師
公設辯護制度
陷阱提醒
考生易誤選 A (律師在場權),因為 Miranda 警告也包含律師權。但題幹關鍵句『anything said...used against...in court』是描述『放棄緘默權的後果』,故空格應填 right to remain silent,別被 Miranda 四項告知中其他項混淆。