The ways to remove a director are multiple in Taiwan's Company Act. Which of the following statements is incorrect?

AAn individual shareholder with 3% shareholding can file a suit and ask the court to remove, with cause, a director of her company.

BA two-thirds majority of shareholders can resolve to remove a director of their company.

CA majority of shareholders can resolve to elect a new board, which in reality removes all sitting directors.

DA majority of supervisors can convene a meeting and remove a director if all supervisors agree to it.正確答案

答案與詳解

正確答案

台灣公司法解任董事有多種方式：股東訴請解任、股東會特別決議解任、改選全面換血；但監察人無解任董事權。

AAn individual shareholder with 3% shareholding can file a suit and ask the court to remove, with cause, a director of her company.訴請解任✕ 錯誤

公司法第200條規定，董事執行業務有重大損害公司行為或違法時，股東會未決議解任時，持有已發行股份總數3%以上股東，得於股東會後30日內訴請法院裁判解任。此敘述正確。

BA two-thirds majority of shareholders can resolve to remove a director of their company.股東會特別決議✕ 錯誤

公司法第199條規定，股東會得以特別決議（代表已發行股份總數三分之二以上股東出席、出席股東表決權過半數同意）解任董事。此敘述正確。

CA majority of shareholders can resolve to elect a new board, which in reality removes all sitting directors.✕ 錯誤

DA majority of supervisors can convene a meeting and remove a director if all supervisors agree to it.✓ 正確

這題的完整詳解,註冊就能看 · 每天 2 題免費

精選詳解